Tech groups weigh in against Texas bill that would limit abortion pill information

Christopher Hutton

May 03, 03:30 AM May 03, 03:30 AM

The restriction of information on abortion is a threat to the health of pregnant women under legislation before the Texas government, a group of technology and free speech advocacy groups argued.

A coalition of advocacy groups wrote a letter to the chairs of the Texas House of Representatives on Wednesday requesting that the leadership oppose House Bill 2690, legislation restricting the sale of select abortion pills in Texas. The bill also includes a clause limiting information about the pills, including removing webpages that might offer information about the drugs or how to get them. The authors of the letter include the left-leaning tech group Chamber of Progress, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and PEN America.

BIDEN, TRUMP, AND DESANTIS CHART DIFFERENT PATHS ON ABORTION A YEAR AFTER DOBBS LEAK

"As drafted, these prohibitions may lead to services censoring direct messages between patients and caregivers on obtaining safe care," they argue in the letter, according to a copy provided exclusively to the Washington Examiner. "It may also force services to block or censor telemedicine counseling services in which medical professionals advise pregnant people on a variety of reproductive health services, including but not limited to legal abortions."

They also argue that not providing sufficient information would "pose harm to all women, especially communities of color and low-income women." They note that "online searches for information about abortion are most common in states with the strictest abortion laws" and claim misinformation could force women to receive dangerous treatments if medical content on the subject is limited.

They said access to medication-based abortion is still protected federally and that women still are allowed to drive across borders to get treatments.

Texas has implemented multiple restrictions on abortion in recent years. Five women sued the state in early March, alleging that the state's laws prevented them from getting abortions despite the life-threatening circumstances they were experiencing.

A federal judge in Texas moved to block the Food and Drug Administration's approval of the abortion drug mifepristone, a product that is explicitly banned by H.B. 2690. The White House said it intends to fight the ruling in court, while House Democrats have submitted legislation to ensure the pills remain on the market.

Amputated 31,000-12 months-previous skeleton sheds light-weight on prehistoric medical advancements

Misty Severi

September 07, 11:58 PM September 07, 11:58 PM

A skeleton that dates back 31,000 many years in Indonesia confirmed the earliest evidence of amputation, and presents modern-day day scholars a glimpse at medieval medical remedies, according to a new examine.

The study, published Wednesday, claimed the amputation transpired when the human being was a kid, however the person died as a young adult. It is also very likely that the tribe or neighborhood that the individual belonged to had to support consider care of the amputee, since it would be tricky to navigate the indigenous terrain of Borneo with one particular leg, according to the guide researcher Tim Maloney, an archaeologist at Griffith College in Australia.

Damaged JEWISH TOMBSTONES FROM PRAGUE Reworked INTO MEMORIAL

“This acquiring very a lot adjustments the regarded background of medical intervention and know-how of humanity,” Maloney stated, according to the Guardian.

At first, the archaeologists thought the foot and element of the leg could have been buried somewhere else. Even so, soon after a nearer glimpse at the stays, it was apparent the cut was intentional, according to the research.

The remaining leg bone confirmed a thoroughly clean, slanted slice that healed in excess of, Maloney claimed, but there had been no signs of an an infection or that the amputation was accidental soon after a break. The experts in its place identified that the leg could have been bitten by an animal such as a crocodile, forcing the amputation. It is unclear what device was used to amputate the foot, but professionals imagine it was a sharp stone resource.

“[The hunter] survived not just as a little one, but as an adult amputee in this rainforest ecosystem,” Maloney claimed. “Importantly, not only does [the stump] deficiency an infection, but it also lacks exclusive crushing.”

The amputation on top of that showed that the tribe understood more than enough about drugs to complete surgical procedure with no lethal blood reduction or an infection, according to the research. Prior to the Indonesia amputation, the earliest known amputation occurred 7,000 many years in France.

“It indicates that early individuals … had mastered intricate surgical techniques allowing for this man or woman to endure soon after the removing of a foot and leg," Maloney reported, according to the outlet.

The expedition and excavation took 11 times and was executed in a joint task by Australian and Indonesian archaeologists. It is believed that the child lived 6-9 decades right after the amputation and died of unfamiliar causes.