Trump and Jean Carroll agree to combine defamation lawsuits into single trial

Cami Mondeaux

March 18, 09:25 AM March 18, 09:25 AM

Former President Donald Trump has agreed to combine two defamation lawsuits filed against him by former magazine columnist E. Jean Carroll, who accused him of raping her in the 1990s and later sued after he claimed she lied about the allegations.

An attorney for Carroll wrote a letter to U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan on Friday to request the separate defamation lawsuits be consolidated into one, noting the move would be crucial to avoid “jury confusion” as both cases focus on the same factual question. If approved, the trial would begin on April 25 and cover damage and liability from both cases.

TRUMP ACCESS HOLLYWOOD TAPE CAN BE PLAYED AT JEAN CARROLL TRIAL: JUDGE

“Because of the overlapping nature of these proceedings, a single trial will reduce costs across the board, avoid the risk of inconsistent factual rulings or jury confusion, and economize matters for the Court (as well as for both parties’ witnesses),” Carroll’s attorney wrote.

The agreement marks the latest in a yearslong legal battle brought by Carroll, who sued Trump for defamation in 2019 after he denied claims he had raped her in a New York department store in the mid-1990s. Carroll filed the suit after Trump repeatedly denied the allegations, describing her as “not my type.”

Carroll filed a second lawsuit in October after Trump wrote in a Truth Social post that the allegations were a “hoax and a lie.” As part of the second suit, Carroll also sued the former president for battery after New York passed a law giving victims of sexual assault the opportunity to sue their alleged perpetrators even if the statute of limitations had expired.

Trump has vehemently denied raping Carroll, who has accused him of sexually assaulting her in a dressing room at the Bergdorf Goodman department store after an alleged encounter in the mid-1990s. Trump has also pushed back on accusations of defamation, arguing his denial was a fair response to her claims.

Trump’s actions around 2020 election not protected by ‘absolute immunity,’ judge rules

Cami Mondeaux

November 29, 10:19 AM November 29, 10:19 AM

Former President Donald Trump does not have “absolute immunity” for actions surrounding the 2020 election that some groups have claimed disenfranchised voters, according to a ruling from a federal judge on Monday.

The ruling from Judge Emmet Sullivan of the D.C. District Court opens the former president up to a lawsuit from the NAACP and the Michigan Welfare Rights Organization, which argue Trump’s actions during the 2020 election cycle unfairly discriminated against some voters. Sullivan’s decision also shuts down arguments from Trump’s lawyers who sought to dismiss the lawsuit, arguing he can’t be held liable in civil lawsuits because of certain immunities he held as president.

TRUMP ATTORNEYS THOUGHT CLARENCE THOMAS WAS ‘ONLY CHANCE’ TO BLOCK CERTIFICATION OF 2020 ELECTION: REPORT

“If Former President Trump disrupted the certification of the electoral vote count, as Plaintiffs allege here, such actions would not constitute executive action in defense of the Constitution,” Sullivan wrote. “For these reasons, the Court concludes that Former President Trump is not immune from monetary damages in this suit.”

Sullivan’s decision does not rule Trump as guilty in the case. Instead, it merely allows the groups to rewrite their lawsuit against the former president to be heard at a later date.

The NAACP and Michigan Welfare Fund sued Trump in late 2020 for his efforts to overturn the results of the presidential election, specifically for “disenfranchising black voters in Michigan” by pressuring state officials not to certify election results. The lawsuit accuses Trump and his campaign of violating the Voting Rights Act of 1965, later expanding to include alleged disenfranchisement in numerous states.

Specifically, the lawsuit argues the former president’s campaign intentionally spread misinformation and “baseless claims” about the 2020 election, encouraged supporters to slow or halt vote-counting efforts, pressured state officials not to certify election results, and challenged the validity of legally cast ballots.

Although Sullivan has not determined whether Trump is guilty in the case, the federal judge had harsh words for the former president in his decision.

“President Trump continues to spread false claims about the 2020 elections and continues to attempt to pressure officials into nullifying the election results: Plaintiffs extensively allege the efforts of former President Trump and his allies as recently as March 2022 to get state officials to overturn the election results; to endorse and provide financial support to candidates for office who supported his false claims of election fraud; all while fundraising for the 2024 Presidential Election,” the judge wrote. “These allegations are perhaps the opposite of what the Trump defendants term ‘vague suggestions of fear or intimidation.’"